Conflicting societal and individual perspectives on solitude.

 The expression "I will always be alone" appears, from the perspective of societal norms, as negative to a mind that has been automated—interpreted as "I am not worthy of anything." Because the mind perceives it this way, the response it produces is equally predetermined and predictable: "If you keep being like this, you will always be alone." They respond reflexively, like machines: “Don’t be like this, or you’ll stay alone.” This is far from an innocent reply. Within its narrow meaning, it communicates only this: “You should be ashamed of being alone.” Why? Because such a homogenized mind equates solitude with failure. It equates aloneness, instantly, with wrongness, even evil. To them, being alone is a defect to be corrected. Yet to choose aloneness is to desecrate the idols of partnership, marriage, and tribe. It is to say, “I do not seek completion from you.” Hence, society’s response comes swiftly, without contemplation: “Don’t say that. You’ll never find anyone if you think like this.” But what is this truly saying? It reveals an intense fear: “You are threatening the myth I live by. If you are whole without us, then what are we? Hollow?” The one who is alone knows this—and still chooses silence. Because perhaps, when that person said, “I will always be alone,” they were not lamenting it; they were simply claiming it. What they truly meant was liberation—from the endless noise of human beings who diminish the soul’s reality.